Which two major groups were involved in the Pharisaic interpretation of the law?

The Pharisaic interpretation of the law primarily developed through the differing perspectives of two prominent schools of thought, represented by Shammai and Hillel. These two rabbinical leaders exemplified contrasting approaches to interpreting Jewish law and tradition.

Hillel is known for his more lenient and compassionate interpretations, promoting a broader understanding of the law that took into account the spirit of the regulations rather than strictly adhering to every letter. This approach often emphasized mercy and the importance of context in legal matters. On the other hand, Shammai is recognized for his stricter, more literal interpretations, which reflected a more rigid adherence to the written law.

The debate and dialogue between these two schools shaped much of the Pharisaic tradition, allowing for a more dynamic understanding of the law that accommodated various circumstances and moral considerations. Thus, their contributions were foundational to how the Pharisees approached scripture and law, highlighting the significance of interpretative debate in Jewish tradition.