What do the "Continental" and "Westminster" views of the Sabbath fundamentally differ in?

The fundamental difference between the "Continental" and "Westminster" views of the Sabbath lies in the interpretation of whether the Sabbath is abolished. The Continental view tends to hold that the specific day of the Sabbath as traditionally understood in the Old Testament is no longer binding on Christians, emphasizing the rest found in Christ rather than a specific observance of a particular day. In contrast, the Westminster view maintains that the Sabbath commandment remains in effect for Christians, and therefore, it is essential to observe a holy day of rest.

Understanding this distinction is crucial for those studying doctrinal differences regarding Sabbath observance. It highlights how views can diverge on the application of biblical teachings in contemporary faith practices. While the other options explore aspects of worship, frequency, and activities related to the Sabbath, the core disagreement about the abolition of the Sabbath serves as the primary theological point of contention between these two traditions.