Infralapsarian and supralapsarian views differ primarily on what aspect of God's decrees?

The infralapsarian and supralapsarian views differ primarily in the logical order of God's decrees, specifically concerning the relationship between God's decision to permit the fall of humanity and His plan for salvation.

Infralapsarianism asserts that God's decree to create humanity and allow the fall comes before His decree to elect certain individuals to salvation. This perspective sees the fall as a part of God's overarching plan, which is primarily rooted in His response to the fall rather than in an initial intention to create a scenario that would require salvation.

In contrast, supralapsarianism posits that God's decree of election (to save some) occurs prior to the decree of the fall. Under this view, the order suggests that God had an overarching plan that includes both the creation of humanity and the eventual fall, but sees the selection for salvation as first in the logical sequence, implying that the fall was part of a predetermined plan.

These differences highlight how each perspective interprets the order and priority of God's decrees relating to human sin and salvation, which is fundamental to understanding various theological doctrines within the Reformed tradition.